Cayla


Twitter/Instgram: @caylfer


pittsburgh penguins meme: 7 goals [2/7] → james neal’s hat-trick against columbus 

sun’s out, guns out

icedkaner:

Hockey boys when their cheeks are pink and their hair is damp and tousled is the best. Like wow I would do you in a heartbeat.

jonathan ‘captain serious’ toews +

capitolsjay:

this guy is systematically undoing the world

puckling:

serenadestrong:

ipreferaviators:

BREAKING NEWS: PATRICK KANE IS NOT 5’11. At least he wasn’t in 2010.
I used to do scientific analyses through pixel comparisons, and I couldn’t resist this challenge. I started out assuming the published heights of Jonathan Toews (6’2”) and Patrick Sharp (6’1”) are correct. Then I used an inches-to-pixels ratio, combined with a depth adjustment to the ratio (to account for standing closer or farther away from the camera), to determine Patrick Kane’s height in this photo. Through ~SCIENCE~.
Five feet, nine and one third inches.
*throws down microphone*
(For those who care, I based each man’s lower height point at the vertical halfway point between the center arches of the two feet. This is the vertical end of the leg, so it avoids any bias based on foot length. Also, I included in the pixel depth adjustment the starting and end pixels for each comparison. The “-1” in the calculated ratio adjustment per depth pixel is so that the pixel in common with both Kane and Toews isn’t counted twice. Finally, I have cried happy and sad tears over this tiny little man so many times I can’t count. I love his 5’ 9 1/3” self more than I can possible express.)

Science!

HA! LOOK MATH-PROOF (not just, “yeah fucking right you lying liar who lies” proof) TOO. :D

puckling:

serenadestrong:

ipreferaviators:

BREAKING NEWS: PATRICK KANE IS NOT 5’11. At least he wasn’t in 2010.

I used to do scientific analyses through pixel comparisons, and I couldn’t resist this challenge. I started out assuming the published heights of Jonathan Toews (6’2”) and Patrick Sharp (6’1”) are correct. Then I used an inches-to-pixels ratio, combined with a depth adjustment to the ratio (to account for standing closer or farther away from the camera), to determine Patrick Kane’s height in this photo. Through ~SCIENCE~.

Five feet, nine and one third inches.

*throws down microphone*


(For those who care, I based each man’s lower height point at the vertical halfway point between the center arches of the two feet. This is the vertical end of the leg, so it avoids any bias based on foot length. Also, I included in the pixel depth adjustment the starting and end pixels for each comparison. The “-1” in the calculated ratio adjustment per depth pixel is so that the pixel in common with both Kane and Toews isn’t counted twice. Finally, I have cried happy and sad tears over this tiny little man so many times I can’t count. I love his 5’ 9 1/3” self more than I can possible express.)

Science!

HA! LOOK MATH-PROOF (not just, “yeah fucking right you lying liar who lies” proof) TOO. :D